feeds

events

   drupa 2008 blog
   Xerox @ drupa
   Xerox at AIIM/On Demand
   Graph Expo 2007
   PMA 2007

events

   Debunking Digital Printing’s ‘Urban Legends’
   A Personal Touch
   What's in YOUR Album?

events

   June 2008
   May 2008
   April 2008
   March 2008
   February 2008
   January 2008
   December 2007
   November 2007
   October 2007
   September 2007
   August 2007
   July 2007
   June 2007
   May 2007
   April 2007
   March 2007
   February 2007
   January 2007
   December 2006
   November 2006
   October 2006
   September 2006
   June 2006
   May 2006
   April 2006
   March 2006
   Full Archive

events

   AIIM/On Demand 07
   AIIM/On Demand 08
   Books
   Business Development
   Creative
   drupa 2008
   General
   Graph Expo 2006
   Graph Expo 2007
   IPEX 2006
   PMA 2007
   PMA 2008
   Personalization
   Sustainability
   Transactional

newsroom

   Xerox Newsroom

blogroll

   "Ideas, Ideas, Ideas"
   Blog on Demand
   IPEX 2002
   Printmode
   Waking Dream
   Comment Request
   Print Color
   A Visit To Lornitropia
   Blogito Ergo Sum
   Quick Printing
   PrintCEO Blog
   Get Bizucated

trade websites

   American Printer
   The Big Picture
   Book Business
   Digital Graphics
   Digital Output
   Digital Publishing Solutions
   DocumentWereld
   Electronic Publishing
   Graphic Arts Monthly
   Graphic Communications World
   Graphic Design: USA
   Graphic Impressions
   High Volume Printing
   Instant & Small Commercial Printer
   In-Plant Graphics
   In-Plant Printer
   OnDemandJournal
   Outputlinks
   Print Buyers Online
   Print Buyer Today
   Print Solutions
   Printing Impressions
   Printing News
   PrintOnDemand
   Print Writer
   Publishers Weekly
   Publishing Executive
   Quick Printing
   WhatTheyThink.com
   Wide-Format Imaging
   Print Industries Market Information
   and Research Organization

Xerox partners

   Adobe
   Alpha Picture
   Atlas
   Caldera
   Challenge
   CP Boug
   Creo
   Duplo
   EFI
   Elan
   Emtex
   ePrint
   EPIC
   GBC
   Greetz
   Group 1
   Horizon
   Hunkeler
   Ibis
   Kern
   Lasermax Roll Systems
   Lytrod
   MBO
   Morgana
   MyPhotoFun
   Pitney Bowes
   Plockmatic
   Powis Parker
   Press Sense
   Titan
   WEKO
   XMPie
   XLPrint
   Zund

Trade Associations

   Association of Graphic
   Solutions Providers

   Graphic Arts Information
   Network (PIA/GATF)

   The Graphic Professionals
   Resource Network

   International Publishing
   Management Association

   PrintImage International





   

« November 2006 | Main | January 2007 »

December 27, 2006

Debunking Digital Printing’s ‘Urban Legends’

As I traveled the world the last seven years evangelizing the value and benefits of digital color printing, I met with thousands of creative professionals, marketers and printers. And it wasn’t too far into my global digital odyssey that I began to spot a pattern in their thinking. I quickly discovered there were four, recurring negative perceptions surrounding digital color printing:

- The image quality isn’t good enough;

- Digital printing’s too expensive;

- The available papers are way too limited; and,

- We don’t have the sophisticated data for variable data printing.

In sales terms, these are the major “objections” to be overcome. Fortunately, each and every one of these “digital printing urban legends,” as I named them, truly has been debunked. In fact, the truth is: digital color printing’s ready for prime-time. It’s designer portfolio-grade and Madison Avenue-approved. It’s client-pleasing and award-winning. And it’s response-generating and totally relevant.

Now, that’s the real-deal. But how do you change these negative perceptions of creatives and marketers, and some printers, too? Well, you have to help educate them . . . everyday. You have to continuously make them aware of the true value and numerous benefits of digital color printing. It’s an on-going process and, today, I thought we’d begin right here – by creatively confronting the four most common objections to digital color printing head-on:

Legend 1: The image quality isn't good enough.
Debunked: Digital color presses achieve professional image quality that effectively complements offset in nearly every application.

Legend 2: Digital printing is too expensive.
Debunked: Digital printing is cost-competitive. Short runs are less expensive than offset. Warehousing and postage costs are often reduced. And value is added through improved response rates, turnarounds and workflow efficiencies.

Legend 3: The available papers are too limited.
Debunked: Ongoing research and development has delivered an ever-widening range of digitally optimized coated and uncoated papers, parchments, cover stock and specialty media to meet almost every need.

Legend 4: We don't have the data for variable data printing.
Debunked: Most one-to-one marketing pieces use basic and easily sourced data, while providing easy ways to collect personal information for future use.

Convinced yet? Please don’t take my word for it, if you’re still a digital disbeliever. Learn more for yourself through a formal investigation I just helped complete intoThe Urban Legends of Digital Color Printing. Here, you’ll find a dozen case studies that describe how advertising agencies, graphic design firms and print services providers have helped debunk these common digital printing misconceptions. So, I invite you to please set your perceptions aside and join the ranks of the digitally enlightened, who each day reap the many benefits offered by vanguard digital color printers and presses. Enjoy! But be afraid. Be very afraid.

Bob Wagner
Vice President, Creative Services Business
Xerox
robert.wagner@xerox.com

December 20, 2006

A Personal Touch

Even in the world of jaded media mongers like me, the partnership with Xerox and XMPie for the production and delivery of the December 2006 cover of Graphic Arts Monthly is something special.

The vibrant color and hip personalization rocketing across more than 70,000 one-of-a-kind covers (first name formed from stars, company scripted across the belly, initials embossed on the nose cone) is cool, to be sure. And a special lagniappe is the fact that each recipient also has a personal URL. Our database department had fun putting that together. Most amazing is how well it works!

All this creates a living laboratory, proving that digital presses are durable and able to run industrial print jobs. And to show Graphic Arts Monthly readers live and online, not just the power of print, but its Internet impact. (We’ll document the results as subscribers update their records. And one added note: our Internet page ranking is certain to soar as news of this project has spread through the media. Nothing more fun than googling yourself and finding your article among the top results. (Hmmmm. . . maybe I should have placed my byline more strategically near the lead.)

Bill Esler
Editor in Chief
Graphic Arts Monthly

December 19, 2006

What's in YOUR Album?

So what's in your photo album? If you're like a growing number of people, it's probably a bunch of photos that were printed digitally, probably on the family inkjet printer.

But what about the big vacation trip or the 50th anniversary album of the couple who were married when Eisenhower was president? Then there are the baby books, weddings and landmark events that deserve something more than an album that spends its days stuffed in the closet by the back door. So you upload the photos to a website and pull out the credit card. A few days later "something more" arrives in the form of a one-off, customized album, ready to fuel smiles, tears and memories. There's no question, the age of the "run of one" photo book is upon us. And there's no shortage of players playing all the angles.

The recent announcement of Shutterfly's acquisition of an undisclosed number of Xerox iGen3s to support its expanding operations (presumably including the company's new operation in Charlotte, NC) is a coup for Xerox. Not only does it put the company in a new market, but Shutterfly has been using HP Indigo presses since it began, so this move no doubt rattles some cages at HP headquarters in Boise. And the arrival of Xerox on Kodak's turf probably has a few Kodak execs pacing their cages, too.

This is a all a good thing for Xerox, even though consumers don't know or care how their albums are printed. They just want the quality to be as good as it can be. Which is where the next race may be. Consumers will be the judge. (Which is actually something of a frightening thought.)

Hmmm. Kodak used to make a big deal out of images being printed on Kodak Paper. Will the next branding campaign in consumer photography be to drive the choice of device used to print one-off books of memories?

Noel Ward
Executive Editor
On Demand Journal